wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
one zero one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it really is easy for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's arrived at to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has attained these stage. Read more
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we're distinct inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, matter to availability of vacancy topic to the approval of your competent authority.
The explained recovery may be used, for the most, for corroboration of your main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered on account of this sort of pointation. The place of occurrence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation by the petitioners. Reliance can also be placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows for a more detailed legal reaction.
only over the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion could be considered, however, we're clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, topic to availability of vacancy matter to your approval of your competent authority.
Criminal cases Inside the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common law systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.
She did note that the boy still needed here considerable therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.